🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.